Showing posts with label psychology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label psychology. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 4, 2011

And That's a Wrap!


I have always enjoyed knowing things, and as a result I have a head full of what's sometimes called "useless information". The internet is a great source of tit-bits and obscure references to add to this internal treasure trove. Today's blog post is actually about gifts, or more specifically the wrapping of gifts, although I'd like to start out by looking at the origins of the phrase "That's a Wrap". I am sure that the bulk of my readers will correctly associate this phrase with the film industry. The word Wrap in this context means to finishing filming a motion picture. So how did we get from "Wrap" to"That's a Wrap"? In answering this question, my research was greatly assisted by an article in The New York Times, written by William Safire in February of 2005.

It would seem that in the 40's and 50's that the phrase used to signify the end of shooting was "Wrap it up". I can imagine a junior film studio employee wrapping the film canisters in brown paper and tying them with string and rushing them to post-production. Somewhere along the way Wrap was transformed from a verb to a noun.

The first reference to "That's a Wrap" is found in Orson's Welles' biography published in 1998. He quotes Charlton Heston's journal from 1957: ''We rehearsed all day . . . the studio brass gathering in the shadows in anxious little knots. By the time we began filming at 5:45, I knew they'd written off the whole day. At 7:40, Orson said: 'O.K., print. That's a wrap on this set.' ''. This doesn't fundamentally answer the question of why, but it satisfies my curiosity, and as such is a classic example of much of what resides in my cranium. Its certainly interesting, and I am sure I will sometime find an opportunity to use this tit-bit in dinner conversation, but its also useless!

I can recommend the source article for this "useless information" tit-bit: William Safire's "It's a Wrap".

So onto wrapping gifts. We just had Christmas and it's now 2011, so there are a string of friends birthday's and other gift giving opportunities on the horizon. With that in mind, I have decided to share with you the best kept wrapping secret, something that changed the way I wrap, and can revolutionize the way YOU wrap.

I read an interesting blog on the Nature.com website on the Psychology Behind Wrapping Paper. which has prompted me to share my secret with the broader internet population. In 1992 Dr Daniel Howard conducted research on the effect of wrapping on the gift recipient. I won't go into the details, but he showed that wrapped gifts are preferred over the non-wrapped variety.

I think that I buy pretty cool gifts for people, but since I tend to be quite disorganized, I used to be left without something to wrap it in. In an emergency there was always newspaper or a page or two from a glossy magazine as a substitute, but then there was the problem of adhesion?!

A few years ago, I had a wrapping brainwave, a true Eureka moment. Why not use tin foil (for non South African's read Aluminium foil). Every kitchen has it and it can be torn from its roll (no need for scissors), and can be wrapped around any object - no adhesive tape required! What's more is that its shiny (Aluminium foil has a reflectivity of between 80 and 88%, depending whether you have the matte side or shiny side outside). Dr Howard's research also showed that the nicer the wrapping the more desirable the gift! Since my discovery I have never been left searching for a last minute means of wrapping a gift.

As I sign off, I thought to debunk a common misconception about the insulation property of Aluminium foil and its use in cooking. Has anyone ever said "put the shiny side inside to keep the heat in"? The truth is that difference between the ability of the matt and shiny sides of the foil to insulate is negligible, and can only be detected with sensitive instruments. It doesn't matter which side is inside!

Monday, January 3, 2011

Habit forming

Since I am now taking my blogging seriously, I have been looking into the subject of forming habits. I am not talking about substance abuse, although that is an interesting subject too - as an example a study published in 2007 in The Lancet journal showed that Alcohol is the 3rd most addictive drug (of the 10 studied). The two more addictive are Heroin and Cocaine. The least addictive drug (on their list) is MDMA (3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine) , more commonly known as Ecstasy as it can induce a feeling of euphoria and reduce anxiety and depression. The interesting thing for me from this study is that alcohol is almost twice as addictive as ecstasy yet alcohol is sold legally, while ecstasy is illegal! Don't get me wrong, I enjoy a glass or two of fine wine, its just interesting how certain products are so intertwined into human history and behavior that they have escaped the control of governments and regulatory bodies. Nevertheless, I digress. Perhaps this will be a good subject for a future blog posting.

Back to my original topic on forming habits. Various web-sites offer various suggestions on what it takes to form a new (good) habit and how long it takes. There seems to be a consensus that practicing the action is important (go figure). Some sites stress the importance of measurement to assess whether progress is being made, while others suggest that there should be rewards to improve motivation.

How long does it take? In the 1960's, a plastic surgeon - Dr Maxwell Maltz, observed that it took 21 days for patients who had lost a limb to stop feeling phantom pains. He postulated that it took 21 days for the brain pathways to be rewired. Since some amputees continue to feel these pains life long, and since people with congenital limb loss also sometimes feel these sensations and pains, the science behind it is probably a lot more complicated, however the principle of forming new neural pathways is sound. Here's a link to more information on Dr Maltz's work.

A more contemporary study looking at the time taken to form new eating habits, published in 2010 in the European Journal of Social Psychology by Phillippa Lally et al showed an exponential curve shaped relationship between time and automaticity - the degree to which the test subjects did the action without thinking. This data suggests that performing the new habit in the first few days has a greater impact than performing it later on. The time to plateau (the time where little further gains were made) ranged from 18 days to 254 days indicating that the actual time to form a new habit was highly variable, and in some individuals can be a very lengthy process. The study also showed that missing a day had little effect on the overall outcomes.

So what's all this got to do with blogging?

I guess the bottom line is that if I want to succeed this time with this blog I need to practice it (preferably daily) until I can perform the action without thinking?! No that's not right, the very nature of the blog requires thought! Perhaps after all I need to view this blogging thing like a habit-forming drug, something that once your hooked you can't easily give-up?!

Perhaps some of you out there who are long term bloggers can give me some thoughts on ensuring longevity of a blog?